Cases 1 - 10 of 11
COOKE et al v. HARTUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02008
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COOKE and MELISSA MEIER
Defendant:
STEPHEN C HARTUNG and JAVA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hartung v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hartung
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Early Bird Tech Limited et al v. Hartung et al
as 1:2019cv00422
Plaintiff:
Early Bird Tech Limited and Global Investment Alliance Inc.
Defendant:
Adam Hartung, Anubhav Saxena and David S. Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Blau v. Ells et al
as 1:2017cv01836
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Blau
Defendant:
M Steven Ells, John R. Hartung, Albert S. Baldocchi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartung v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hartung
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Cenlar Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
VASVARI v. HARTUNG
as 3:2016cv06461
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S VASVARI
Defendant:
MICHELL HARTUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Wei et al
as 1:2015cv09691
Plaintiff:
Allan Scott
Defendant:
Benjamin Tiangbing Wei, New York Global Group, Inc., NYGG (Asia), Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitz v. Ells et al
as 1:2012cv02635
Plaintiff:
Francis Schmitz
Defendant:
Steve Ells , Montgomery F. Moran , John R. Hartung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Ells et al
as 1:2012cv02527
Plaintiff:
Joanne Nelson
Defendant:
Steve Ells, Montgomery F Moran, Albert S Baldocchi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Hartung v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07071
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hartung
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
