Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 120
HARTUNG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15976
Plaintiff: MICHAEL AARON HARTUNG
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Castile v. Lichtefeld et al
as 3:2021cv00648
Plaintiff: Michael Castile
Defendant: Geoffrey Lichtefeld, Doordash, Inc. and Stephen Hartung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hartung-Rednour v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00795
Plaintiff: Katherine S. Hartung-Rednour
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartung v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff: Wayne Hartung
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTUNG et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19280
Plaintiff: JOHN HARTUNG and BOBBI JO HARTUNG
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62044
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS HARTUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-62044
Plaintiff: HARTUNG
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
HARTUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42339
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW HARTUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-42339
Plaintiff: HARTUNG
Defendant: 3M COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?