Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hasan v. Shu Chung Wang
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mohammad N. Hasan
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chung Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Banilla Games, Inc. et al v. Coastal Fuel LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Banilla Games, Inc. and Grover Gaming, Inc.
Defendant:
Coastal Fuel LLC, Syed Hasan Jafari and Florida Southwest Group LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Salim Manek
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Bayadi v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Hasan Bayadi
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Lewis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Tarik Hasan Hudgins
Defendant:
Dr. Benny Mullins, MD, Nurse Tiffani Stanley, RN, Nurse Smith, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Tate Bywater Law Firm et al
as 1:2021cv01049
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hughes
Defendant:
Tate Bywater Law Firm, James R Tate, Douglas E. Bywater and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Carrusco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrusco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
