Cases 1 - 10 of 133
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'GORMAN MOTORS INC v. BRYANT ROGERS et al
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
O'GORMAN MOTORS INC
Defendant:
JASMIN BRYANT ROGERS and HASSAN A CHILDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P. v. HECTOR DAO et al
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P.
Defendant:
HECTOR DAO, FAROOQ HASSAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
HASSAN et al v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2023cv21537
Plaintiff:
MANAL HASSAN and TAREK KHAIRALLAH
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, CITY OF TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER AARON BERNSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARRIENTOS v. WALLYS HOT BAGELS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01840
Plaintiff:
BEATRIZ BARRIENTOS
Defendant:
WALLYS HOT BAGELS, LLC and WALLY HASSAN
MOSBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv06237
Petitioner:
HASSAN MOSBY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JENKINS v. CORDOVA et al
as 2:2022cv06482
Plaintiff:
RAHGEAM JENKINS
Defendant:
GERVOSO CORDOVA, S. HASSAN, LUIS RIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
