Cases 1 - 10 of 241
Hayden v. Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80523
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayden
Defendant:
Viking Arms Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthew Puglia v. Alvin Nienhuis, et al
as 24-10186
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PUGLIA
Defendant:
ALVIN NIENHUIS, KENNETH D. HAYDEN, PHILIP LAKIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HAYDEN v. OUTLAW RENTALS INC. et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAYDEN
Defendant:
OUTLAW RENTALS INC., CLASSY CYCLES INC., COLLEEN SWAB and others
SORTWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31763
Plaintiff:
HAYDEN SORTWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27458
Plaintiff:
HAYDEN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25391
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAYDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAYDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24438
Plaintiff:
KOLTON HAYDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CANNING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18733
Plaintiff:
HAYDEN CANNING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
