Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Bowen v. Sidney Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Bowen
Defendant:
Sidney Police Department, Hayden Bronne, Joseph Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schimborski v. The Phi Kappa Tau Fraternity
as 1:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Hayden Schimborski
Defendant:
The Phi Kappa Tau Fraternity
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hayden v. 2K Games, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
James Hayden
Defendant:
2K Games, Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hayden v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 2:2023cv01694
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hayden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01394
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Caleb Nathaniel Hayden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hayden v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Robert O. Hayden
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hajdin v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
James Robert Hajdin and James Robert Hayden
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Governor Mike DeWine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hayden v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv04398
Plaintiff:
Trisha L Hayden
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayden v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02889
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hayden
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
