Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Tucker v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tucker
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Headly et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Reynolds
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Headly et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hall
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00173
Plaintiff:
Colby Smith
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00177
Plaintiff:
Rico Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wills v. Headly et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00184
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Wills
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debruce v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00181
Plaintiff:
Leroy Debruce
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slade v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Slade
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashmore v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00169
Plaintiff:
F. Mauri Ashmore
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shack v. Headly et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joe Shack
Defendant:
Warden Headly, Warden Surles and Staton Correctional
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
