Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Heady et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07407
Plaintiff:
Kim Heady and Timothy Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady et al v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv25324
Plaintiff:
Judy Heady and Carl Heady
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v Heady et al
as 1:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Dane Heady, Michael Weaver, Eddie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04040
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. DeBoo
as 5:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Kuma J. DeBoo , Richard Heady and Eddie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jemison v. Deboo et al
as 1:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
K. Deboo, R. Reed, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cupp v. Reed et al
as 2:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Steven O. Cupp
Defendant:
Richard Reed, Dane Heady, Joyce Francis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kalita v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00073
Plaintiff:
Frank Phillip Kalita, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Joyce Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 2:2007cv00018
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harold Watts, K. M. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Vaughn v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Donta T. Vaughn
Defendant:
Martin Garza, C/O Tompkins, C/O Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
