Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Kowal v. Hooker & Holcombe, Inc
as 24-976
Plaintiff: CASSANDRE KOWAL and SAMANTHA KELLER
Defendant: HOOKER & HOLCOMBE, INC, HOOKER & HOLCOMBE RETIREMENT SERVICES, INC., HOOKER & HOLCOMBE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC. and others
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant: Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff: Mishanta Reyes
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant: Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, Anthem Health Plans Inc, National Account Service Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC et al v. KATZ et al
as 2:2019mc00170
Respondent: SHARON KATZ, FOLKMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C. and SHARON BUCHHOLZ
Petitioner: BROKERAGE CONCEPTS LLC and HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?