Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Kabir v. Mocek
as 2:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Ghesal Kabir and Faryal Kabir
Defendant:
Crystal Mocek
Petitioner:
California Hearing Officers, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Valdivia, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:1994cv00671
Plaintiff:
Vincent Cervantes , Steven G Williams , Alfred Yancy and others
Defendant:
Michael Connolly , Marisela Montes , James W Nielsen and others
Amicu:
California Attorneys for Criminal Justice , San Diego Criminal Defense Bar Association and Criminal Defense Lawyers Club of San Diego
Pecial_master:
Chase Riveland, Virginia Morrison and Nancy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilb et al v. California Correctional Peace Officers Association et al
as 2:2008at00972
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association, Stationary Engineers Local 39 International Union Of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO and others
Petitioner:
David A Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gilb, et al v. John Chiang, et al
as 2:2008cv01960
Intervenor Defendant:
California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Correctional Peace Officers Association, California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner:
David A. Gilb and Department of Personnel Administration
Respondent:
John Chiang and Office of the State Controller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Petersen v. California Special Education Hearing Office McGeorge School of Law, Et Al.
as 1:2007cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael - Petersen
Defendant:
California Special Education Hearing Office McGeorge School of Law, Vincent Pastorino, Mount Diablo Unified School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
