Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Watson v. Optum Headquarters et al
as 6:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
Optum Headquarters, Heather Ciafrocco, Christ Zaetta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Radig v. Wilgus et al
as 5:2022cv04022
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Radig
Defendant:
Off. Jason Wilgus, Sgt. (fnu) Supanic and Off. (fnu) Ewy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pennington et al v. Meyers et al
as 2:2021cv02591
Defendant:
Coco Moore, Dave Dauvenmire, Deborah Lynn and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pennington and Brooke Pennington
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hasenbank v. Gronniger et al
as 5:2020cv04082
Defendant:
Don Gronniger, Mandy Jone and Dan Gronniger
Plaintiff:
Heather Hasenback and Heather Hasenbank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Babakr v. Goerdel et al
as 2:2020cv02037
Defendant:
Dorothy M. Daley, Jacob T. Fowles, Charles R. Epp and others
Plaintiff:
Muzafar Babakr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia et al v. Leavenworth, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2019cv02049
Plaintiff:
Midwest Trust Company, The and Heather Garcia
Defendant:
Matthew Harrington and Leavenworth, Kansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thayer v. University of Kansas Health System, The
as 2:2018cv02386
Defendant:
The University of Kansas Health System and University of Kansas Health System, The
Plaintiff:
Heather Thayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
