Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia, F.C.I. Hazelton and Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witt v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heather Witt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blackwell v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Norman Blackwell
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Ray (Warden)
as 5:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Heather Ray (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abraham v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Daniel Abraham
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bryant v. West Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Bryant
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Corrections, Super. Mr. Thompson, Maj. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa-Sanchez v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Gilbert Rosa-Sanchez
Respondent:
Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montenegro-Arevalo v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00333
Petitioner:
Paulo Cesar Montenegro-Arevalo
Respondent:
Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00296
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
