Cases 41 - 50 of 78
SMOCK v. LIPNIC et al
as 1:2019cv01381
Defendant:
VICTORIA A. LIPNIC, PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, PAUL ROGERS and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEATHER A. WILSON
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SMOCK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCCLURE v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KEN PAXTON, JENNIFER THARP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINO et al v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2018cv02750
Plaintiff:
HEATHER RALLY, LORI MARINO, LESLIE CORNICK and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, TIM GALLUDET, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BERNHARDT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2018cv02739
Plaintiff:
E.P., DANA MARIE BERNHARDT, JANET PARESI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHLUS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01983
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CHLUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNESS v. MATTIS et al.
as 1:2018cv01796
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Arness
Undetermined:
SECAF SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE and SECDOD SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Defendant:
HEATHER WILSON and JAMES MATTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FIELDS al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2018cv01437
Plaintiff:
TAMARA FIELDS , ESTATE OF LLOYD CARL FIELDS JR. , HEATHER CREACH and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
VOE v. MATTIS et al
as 1:2018cv01251
Defendant:
JAMES N. MATTIS, HEATHER A. WILSON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
