Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Driggs Bills & Day et al v. Utah State Bar et al
as 2:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Driggs Bills & Day and Matthew W. Driggs
Defendant:
Utah State Bar, John R. Lund, H. Dickson Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
T. v. Alliant Techsystems Plan 1A-Active Health Plan et al
as 1:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Heather T.
Defendant:
Alliant Techsystems Plan 1A-Active Health Plan and Alliant Techsystems
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hulinsky v. Brereton
as 2:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Craig L Hulinsky
Defendant:
Heather Brereton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Lewis et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Heather Buchanan
Defendant:
Sharon Lewis and AAA Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortiz v. Torgenson et al
as 2:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Sarah Torgenson, FNU Cultur, Roger Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01056
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Hansen
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jiricko v. Frankenburg Jensen Law Firm et al
as 2:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Milos Jiricko
Defendant:
Frankenburg Jensen Law Firm , Carolyn Stevens Jensen , Jenifer M. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helo Energy et al v. Hoggan et al
as 1:2016mc00016
Plaintiff:
Helo Energy , Sand Canyon of Tehachapi and Saugatuck Energy
Defendant:
Jefrey Hoggan , Kent A. Hoggan , Heather K. Kann and others
Cross_defendant:
RAR Energy Consulting, Fishcreek Capital Funding, Rudy Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Romero v. Office of Recovery Services et al
as 2:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jo Romero
Defendant:
Office of Recovery Services, Angela Memmot, Keli Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schultz v. Averett et al
as 2:2015cv00720
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Schultz
Defendant:
Michael Averett , Heather Bateman , Kasey Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
