Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles et al v. Loudoun County Family Services et al
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles and Kathleen Hedrick
Defendant:
Loudoun County Family Services, Heather Buller, Lyle Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyche v. Hupp et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jaquelle Wyche
Defendant:
Drayke Hupp, Heather Mounie and Captain Lucy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Osborne et al
as 7:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Heather A. Osborne, M.D. Powers, T. Leedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Stowe et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Martin, J. M. and Christopher James Martin
Defendant:
Heather Stowe, Kathleen Rust Bell and Byron Rashard Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Harrell et al
as 7:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Wesley Rex Jones
Defendant:
Shelby Harrell, Heather Boyd and Jeff Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Harrell et al
as 7:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Wesley Rex Jones
Defendant:
Shelby Harrell, Heather Boyd and Jeff Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv01036
Petitioner:
James Edward Carter
Respondent:
Melvin Johnson, Wayne Handley and Heather Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesmith v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elraheem Nesmith
Defendant:
Dr. Melvin Johnson, Wayne Handley and Heather Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bean v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Euphrates Bean
Defendant:
Dr. Melvin Johnson, Wayne Handley, Heather Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
