Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04070
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Hogan
as 4:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Heather Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Hogan et al
as 4:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Heather Hogan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Bonneville Power Administration et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Carey Anderson, Karen Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Loy v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
John Loy
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Sharon Coleman-Deems, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacKintosh v. Hogan et al
as 4:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh
Defendant:
Heather Hogan, . Shah and . Mary-Beth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Speagle v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2023cv04052
Plaintiff:
Billy A Speagle
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Vipin Shah, Mary Patricia Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Donothan et al
as 4:2023cv04046
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Greg Donothan, William Epperson, Gary Kulhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lollis v. Donathan et al
as 4:2021cv04212
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Lollis
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Shan Jumper, Heather Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv01906
Plaintiff:
Edward Gresham
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Andrew Eddy, John Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
