Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Colon v. Noradin et al
as 1:2023cv16798
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Colon
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Petitioner:
Tyrone Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Noradin, et al
as 1:2023cv16799
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Clay
Defendant:
Anthony F. Noradin, Samuel J. Cirone, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alvarez-Martinon (PS) v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv02851
Petitioner:
Hector Alvarez-Martinon
Respondent:
Jeff Long, Andre Moses Stencil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector Alvarez v. Warden, et al
as 23-12165
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR ALVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Hector AlvarezIn re: Hector Alvarez
as 23-11419
Petitioner:
In re: HECTOR ALVAREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Hector Alvarez v. Hamilton WR Warden, et al
as 23-10778
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR ALVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
HAMILTON WR WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
IMIRACLE (HK) LIMITED v. Melijul LLC et al
as 1:2022cv24203
Plaintiff:
IMIRACLE (HK) LIMITED
Defendant:
Melijul LLC doing business as Pipe Dreams Tobacco Shop, Vanessa Hernandez and Hector Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
MBI Services, LLC v. Apex Distribution LLC et al
as 1:2021cv20975
Defendant:
Imitari Corporation, Jan Laurence Sadick, Hector Alvarez and others
Plaintiff:
MBI Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hector Alvarez Aldana v. William Barr
as 20-72396
Petitioner:
HECTOR ANTONIO ALVAREZ ALDANA, AKA Hector Antonio Aldana, AKA Hector Alvarez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Russell v. Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01163
Defendant:
Brian DeJesus, Edward Heerdt, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
jerrell russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
