Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ambo v. Conover et al
as 2:2015cv14094
Plaintiff:
David Ambo
Defendant:
Chad Conover, Ryan Braathen, Pat Depriest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michigan State Painters Insurance Fund v. Leo J. Hein Construction, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14100
Plaintiff:
Michigan State Painters Insurance Fund
Defendant:
Leo J. Hein Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hardy v. Barbre et al
as 2:2014cv13438
Plaintiff:
Chester Hardy
Defendant:
Barbre, R Woodrow, Daniel Heins and others
Detroit Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds v. Leo J. Hein Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11192
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Leo J. Hein Construction, Inc., JFS Company, LLC, Leo J. Hein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Chesney v. Jackson, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11097
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Chesney
Defendant:
Jackson, City of , Paul Gross , Timothy Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edison v. Jackson, City of et al
as 2:2013cv12696
Plaintiff:
David William Edison
Defendant:
Jackson, City of , Matthew Heins , Paul Gross and others
Moralez v. City of Jackson Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv12302
Plaintiff:
Abelardo Moralez
Defendant:
City of Jackson Police Department, Elmer Hitt , Rick Burkart and others
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. J Hein Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13190
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
J Hein Construction, Inc., Leo J Hein, Mary K Hein and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Leo J Hein Construction, Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv10072
Plaintiff:
Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Leo J Hein Construction, Incorporated, Leo J Hein and Mary Hein
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Nouri v. Oakland County Jail et al
as 2:2010cv13700
Plaintiff:
Labeed Nouri
Defendant:
Oakland County Jail, Oakland County Sheriff's Department, Michael Bouchard and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
