Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Helding v. USA
as 3:2022cv00675
Petitioner:
Joel J. Helding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Winston, Shomas v. Held, Brian et al
as 3:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Captain Congleton, Jeremy Rohde, Sgt. Bade and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Shomas T. Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenti-Held Contractor/Developer, Inc. v. Drax, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Valenti-Held Contractor/Developer, Inc.
Defendant:
Drax, Inc. , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and City of Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes et al v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Holmes , Otha Keith Fair , Jose Maldonado and others
Defendant:
City of Racine, Gary Becker, John Dickert and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Blanck, Walter v. Mil. FBI et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Walter Blanck
Defendant:
Mil. FBI, CIA, ATF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elkins, Michael v. Held, Karl et al
as 3:2011cv00170
Petitioner:
Michael S. Elkins
Respondent:
Karl Held, Salley Tess and Denise Symdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toussaint Bolling v. Murphy et al
as 1:2010cv00678
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Toussaint Bolling
Defendant:
Mary Lynn Murphy and Karl Held
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schroeder v. Drankiewicz et al
as 2:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schroeder
Defendant:
Doug Drankiewicz , Karl Held and Quala Champagne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mezouane v. Miller et al
as 2:2008cv00715
Plaintiff:
Anna Mezouane
Defendant:
Administrator Miller, Unknown, Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davalos v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2008cv00712
Plaintiff:
Cerafin Davalos
Defendant:
City of Racine, Jeff Coe, Robert Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
