Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11359
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11251
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11193
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11112
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Krefetz, et al v. Cameron
as 17-1576
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA KREFETZ, Receiver, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF BOSTON, Housing Division
Defendant - Appellant:
HELEN CAMERON
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Fannie Mae
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11026
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Krefetz et al v. Cameron
as 1:2017cv10860
Plaintiff:
Joshua Krefetz, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Inspectional Services Department
Defendant:
Helen Cameron and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Boston Inspectional Services Department v. Cameron
as 1:2017cv10453
Defendant:
Helen Cameron
Plaintiff:
City of Boston Inspectional Services Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Slavin et al v. Cameron
as 1:2015cv10084
Plaintiff:
Michael Slavin, John Connors, Boston Inspectional Services Department and others
Defendant:
Helen Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cameron v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 08-8047
Petitioner:
HELEN CAMERON
Respondent:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS, BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
