Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01396
Petitioner: Chad Arnold
Respondent: County of San Diego Corporation, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 21-55348
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and HELEN ROBBINS-MEYER, in her official capacity as the County of San Diego's Chief Administrative Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY, AMERICAN SNUFF COMPANY, MODORAL BRANDS INC. and others
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. USDC-CASDIn re: South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. USDC-CASD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-70769
Petitioner: BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Not Classified By Court: WILLIAM D. GORE, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the County of San Diego, WILMA J. WOOTEN, in her official capacity as Public Health Officer, County of San Diego, TOMAS ARAGON, in his official capacity as California Public Health Officer and others
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56358
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California, WILLIAM D. GORE, in his official capacity as Sheriff of the County of San Diego and others
Forbes v. Macchione, FACHE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00998
Plaintiff: Ashton Forbes
Defendant: Nick Macchione, FACHE, Helen Robbins-Meyer, Dr. Wilma Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55533
Plaintiff / Appellant: BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California, HELEN ROBBINS-MEYER, in her official capacity as Director of Emergency Services and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE and BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; DISCIPLES JUSTICE ACTION NETWORK; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES O
South Bay United Pentecostal Church et al v. Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00865
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, William D. Gore, Kevin Faulconer and others
Plaintiff: Rabbi Mendel Polichenco, South Bay United Pentecostal Church and Bishop Arthur Hodges III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Lewis et al v. McGowen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00843
Plaintiff: Thomas J. Lewis and Leticia G. Lewis
Defendant: Bill McGowen , William Gore , Diane Jacob and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gray v. Vianzon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02978
Plaintiff: Daryl Gray
Defendant: Armin Vianzon, Jr., Jose Jimenez, Juan Andrade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrea v. San Diego County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03149
Plaintiff: Christopher Carrea, Jr
Defendant: San Diego County, Helen Robbins-Meyers, San Diego County Public Defenders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?