Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Burman v. Bristol-Myers Squib Company et al
as 3:2013cv03648
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIB COMPANY , MCKESSON CORPORATION, Alfred Crudele, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Burman , Wanda Burman , Tracy L. Clemens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROWN v. HENDRIX
as 2:2012cv07441
Petitioner:
CLIVE AMROY ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAFAYETTE v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2011cv03389
Petitioner:
SHECHEM LAFAYETTE
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRIX, JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GUIDOTTI v. LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
DAWN GUIDOTTI
Defendant:
LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, L.L.C. , ECLIPSE SERVICING, INC. , GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MAYNARD v. HENDRIX
as 2:2011cv00605
Petitioner:
IAN T. MAYNARD
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HENDRIX v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2010cv05876
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENDRIX, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, AARON BERNSTEIN and TARA STEFANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2010cv05339
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ADAMS
Defendant:
HENDRIX, PRINGLE, UNKNOWN CAPTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. BROWN et al
as 3:2010cv03110
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROSARIO
Defendant:
DEVON BROWN, VERNON BROWN, E. BURNETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D. v. MICKENS et al
as 1:2010cv02902
Plaintiff:
TROY D.
Defendant:
FELIX MICKENS, JOHN OR JANE DOE #1, JOHN OR JANE DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YOUNGBLOOD v. SCORSESE et al
as 2:2010cv02172
Plaintiff:
LONNIE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN SCORSESE, EXPERIENCE HENDRIX LLC, JANIE HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
