Cases 1 - 10 of 266
De La Paz v. 2U, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11049
Plaintiff:
Henry De La Paz
Defendant:
2U, Inc. and edX, LLC
Berrios v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10705
Plaintiff:
Henry Berrios
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Chavez v. Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10330
Plaintiff:
Henry Chavez and Jardineira Betances
Defendant:
Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
Chavez v. Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv10328
Plaintiff:
Henry Chavez and Jardineira Betances
Defendant:
Family Medical Leave Massachusetts
Rochester v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv10210
Plaintiff:
James Henry Rochester
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gelwan v. Bartlett
as 3:2023cv30079
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Lloyd A. Gelwan
Defendant:
Henry E Bartlett d/b/a/ BARTLETT CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Walker v. Sea Harvest, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11534
Plaintiff:
Henry Walker
Defendant:
Sea Harvest, Inc. and Fishing Vessel Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
McCance, et al v. Kreger, et al
as 1:2023cv10955
Petitioner:
William Henry McCance, Susan Marie LeMoine, Trust Advisory Group, LTD and others
Respondent:
Richard Henri Kreger, Bruce Charles Ryan and RHK Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. UGO Logistics, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10438
Plaintiff:
Ricquan Jones and Davyn Encarnacion
Defendant:
UGO Logistics, LLC, Henry Emele, Kara Emele and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
