Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Matura v. Friend et al
as 3:2026cv02011
Plaintiff:
Matt Matura
Defendant:
Matthew Friend, Mark G. Parker, Heidi O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Matura v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2026cv02012
Plaintiff:
Matt Matura
Defendant:
John J. Donahoe, II, Matthew Friend, Mark G. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Brogdon v. Pedro
as 2:2026cv01989
Petitioner:
Henry Brogdon
Respondent:
David J. Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Townsend v. Woodland
as 2:2026cv01762
Petitioner:
Henry Alexander Townsend
Respondent:
Joe Woodland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenell et al v. Donahoe et al
as 3:2026cv01470
Plaintiff:
Tianna Jenell
Defendant:
John J. Donahoe, II, Matthew Friend, Cathleen Benko and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Brogdon v. Pedro
as 2:2026cv01428
Petitioner:
Henry Brogdon
Respondent:
David J. Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yahtin v. Board of Parole and Post Prision Supervision
as 3:2026cv00950
Petitioner:
Henry Jim Yahtin
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post Prision Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. City of Ashland et al
as 1:2026cv00601
Plaintiff:
James Maurice Henry
Defendant:
City of Ashland, Jackson County, Ashland Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
