Cases 1 - 10 of 2,267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Huerta v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv04790
Plaintiff:
Henry Huerta
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Raybon C. Johnson, Jr., Mateo Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Gilliam v. Covello et al.,
as 2:2024cv01613
Petitioner:
Forrest Henry Gilliam
Respondent:
Patrick Covello and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Tolan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04763
Plaintiff:
Peter Tolan
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Matt Townsley and Chris Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(HC) Tessmer v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Tessmer Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
David Henry Curry
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
