Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Holmes v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2023cv04003
Plaintiff:
Montrell Holmes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Kurt Osmundson and Henry Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Brannon-Dortch et al
as 4:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
O'Shea Scott
Defendant:
Christine Brannon-Dortch, Wexford Health Care Source Inc, Casey Hodgeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv04066
Plaintiff:
Edmund Cyrus Long
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Henry Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2019cv50091
Defendant:
Dr. Obassi, John R. Baldwin, Henry Hill Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tosh v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2019cv04081
Plaintiff:
Jason Tosh
Defendant:
Mendi Pilger, Henry Hill Correctional Center, Stephanie J Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Henry Hill Correctional Center
as 4:2017cv04187
Plaintiff:
Jeff Patrick
Defendant:
Henry Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv01357
Plaintiff:
Albert Boyd and All Vegan Recipients of Henry Hill Correctional Center
Defendant:
Stephen Wright, James Rundle, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv01177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Walker, Albert Boyd and All Vegan Recipients of Henry Hill Correctional Center
Defendant:
Stephen Wright, James Rundle, Freddie Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frauenreder v. Durkin et al
as 1:2008cv01093
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frauenreder
Defendant:
Patrick D Durkin and Warden Henry Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
