Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sunrise Builders, Inc. v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00715
Respondent:
Sonna Singleton Gregory, Clayton County Zoning Advisory Group, Carlton Holloway and others
Petitioner:
Sunrise Builders, Inc.
Anderson et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Armond Rhian Cox, Eileen Shipsey, Ashley Nicole Rodenheiser and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Corkerin et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03658
Plaintiff:
Vertus Corkerin , Andrew Harris , Susan Stewart and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Corkerin et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv04803
Plaintiff:
Vertus Corkerin , Andrew Harris , Susan Stewart and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62232
Plaintiff:
HERMAN TURNER and IDA MAE TURNER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv70961
Plaintiff:
HERMAN TURNER and AUDREY TURNER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, CAREY CANADA CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
