Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Hernandez Trujillo v. Miller
as 2:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
Javier Hernandez Trujillo
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Read v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Lacy Erin Read
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Colette Peters, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. DOJ et al
as 6:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson and Michael Swanson
Defendant:
DOJ, Michael Mosman, Youlee Yim You and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barajas De Hernandez v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Araceli Barajas De Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willis v. Hernandez
as 3:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Judge Marco Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Kelly
as 6:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
Jesus Raymundo Velasco Hernandez
Respondent:
OSP Superintendent Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nottingham v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Nottingham
Defendant:
Williams and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
