Cases 81 - 90 of 345
HERNANDEZ v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT(s)
as 5:2021cv00130
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
Petitioner:
DIEGO HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01505
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Odulia Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
as 5:2021cv00122
Defendant:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT(S)
Plaintiff:
DIEGO HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Unnamed Respondent(s)
as 1:2021cv01494
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent(s)
Petitioner:
Diego Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2021cv01305
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Plaintiff:
Diego Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01261
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sergio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Epic Logistics and Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Epic Logistics and Company, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Ace American Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America et al v. Gulf Building et al
as 2:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Hernandez Consulting A Joint Venture, LLC, Berkley Insurance Company, Gulf Building and others
Plaintiff:
Central Southern Construction Corp and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Ruiz-Hernandez v. Paulding County, Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Paulding County, Georgia, Gary Gulledge and Sheila Craton
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Ruiz-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Moore et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Buddy Moore Trucking, Inc., Canal Insurance Company and Marvin Cline Moore
Plaintiff:
Treva Hernandez
Intervenor Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
