Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Binh C. Tran v. Cynthia Y. Tampkins et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Binh C. Tran
Defendant:
Warden Cynthia Y. Tampkins, Chief Deputy Warden Lavelle Parker, Kerry Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burley v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10370
Defendant:
Tylutki, Randall Haas, Quniton and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Burley
Kensu v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv10175
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dan Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Davis v. Thomas et al
as 5:2018cv10075
Plaintiff:
Jeanette D Davis
Defendant:
Renee Thomas, Millicent Warren, Alan Greason and others
Finley v. Brown County et al
as 1:2017cv01009
Plaintiff:
Timothy Finley
Defendant:
Brown County , Timothy A Hinkfuss, David L Lasee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Brewer et al
as 4:2017cv11273
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cox
Defendant:
Shawn Brewer, Corizon, MDOC/BHCS and others
Joel Carter v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, DAVID DAWDY, Director of Corrections Mental Health Program, BILL VETTE, Mental Health Rights Specialist of Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Ryan v. Carson City Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv10562
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Carson City Correctional Facility, FNU Holmes, FNU Spurlling and others
Williams v. Schuette et al
as 2:2016cv14237
Plaintiff:
Donnell DeFrance Williams
Defendant:
Bill Schuette, Daniel H. Heyns, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and others
Raleem-X v. Larry Brown, et al
as 16-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BROWN, SIG Coordinator, T. LEE, Corrections Officer Sergeant, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Formal Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
