Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff: Thi Thanh Ngoc Doan, Duc Hinh Pham, Minh Hieu Pham and others
Defendant: Vuong Ba Do, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Tung Dang, et al v. CIR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-70922
Petitioner / Appellant: TUNG DANG and HIEU PHAM DANG
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Hieu Pham v. Board of Regents UCSF, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16541
Plaintiff / Appellant: HIEU PHAM, DDS, MD
Defendant / Appellee: BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, San Francisco School of Dentistry, BRIAN BAST, In His Individual Capacity and ANTHONY POGREL, In His Individual Capacity
Pham v. Board of Regents of the University of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01498
Plaintiff: Hieu Pham
Defendant: Board of Regents of the University of California , Anthony Pogrel and Brian Bast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHAM v. BOARD OF REGENTS UCSF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv04194
Plaintiff: HIEU PHAM
Defendant: BOARD OF REGENTS UCSF, TONY POGREL and BRIAN BAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?