Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thomas v. Patti et al
as 6:2023cv06486
Plaintiff:
JyQuale Thomas
Defendant:
Sgt Patti, Officer Higgins, Officer Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorer v. Higgins, et al
as 9:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Devonte Moorer
Defendant:
Paul B. Higgins, Leodan H. Contreras and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorer v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2022cv10853
Defendant:
Paul B. Higgins, Leodan H. Contreras and United States of America
Plaintiff:
DeVonte Moorer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
S-King v. New York County/City et al
as 1:2021cv05622
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, New York County District Attorney Office, George Negron and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce S-King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05582
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Michael Fernandez v. Aramark
as 1:2019cv01880
Defendant:
Aramark
Plaintiff:
Michael Fernandez, Robert Higgins, Felipe Cotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Alamo Rental Car Company et al
as 1:2018cv06795
Defendant:
Alamo Rental Car Company, Kevin Higgins, District Attorney Richard A. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Sheldon K. Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
