Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Shaffer v. City of Defiance, Ohio et al.
as 3:2023cv02453
Plaintiff: Roberta Natasha-Lynn Shaffer
Defendant: City of Defiance, Ohio, Whitney Schalk and Zachary Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Higgins v. USA
as 3:2023cv00347
Petitioner: Brian Higgins
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Higgins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03573
Plaintiff: Robert Higgins
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Higgins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01929
Plaintiff: Stacie Higgins
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris et al v. Hunt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01255
Plaintiff: Isaiah S. Harris, Sr., Isaiah S. Harris, Jr., Iyana S. Harris and others
Defendant: Deborah S. Hunt, Clarence Maddox, Susan Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00817
Plaintiff: Lillian Higgins
Defendant: CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Higgins v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05003
Plaintiff: David Higgins
Defendant: C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04777
Plaintiff: Steven Higgins
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2021cv01124
Defendant: $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Interested Party: Thomas Higgins
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Higgins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02357
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dale Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?