Cases 1 - 10 of 68
SHI v. FORBES HEALTH FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
NAN SHI
Defendant:
FORBES HEALTH FOUNDATION doing business as ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK FORBES REGIONAL HOSPITAL, ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (AHN) PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, HIGHMARK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZIMMERMAN et al v. HIGHMARK INC.
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZIMMERMAN and CHANNELLE ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
HIGHMARK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
AINSWORTH-HOLLY v. HIGHMARK INC.
as 2:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
DIANA AINSWORTH-HOLLY
Defendant:
HIGHMARK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
STEETLE v. HIGHMARK INC.
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STEETLE
Defendant:
HIGHMARK INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act
HARRISON v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HARRISON
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MARSHALL v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
WENDY MARSHALL
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DOE v. HIGHMARK, INC.
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
HIGHMARK, INC. and HIGHMARK HEALTH
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CAITLYN WARUSZEWSKI, KEVIN HARRISON, WENDY MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Valentin v. Highmark, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Valentin
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
