Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Solis et al v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2010cv11645
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Frank McDonnell, Sharon McDonnell and Sylvestre Franc, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Solis v. Accurate Paving, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11349
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Accurate Paving, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. R.C.R Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2010mc30017
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Respondent:
R.C.R Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Ruscio
Solis v. R.C.R. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv30165
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Respondent:
R.C.R. Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Ruscio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. LGS Consulting Group LLC et al
as 1:2010mc00106
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
LGS Consulting Group LLC and James Lawson
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. ROCK SECURITY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv01586
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
ROCK SECURITY SERVICES, INC. and JOAQUIN PENA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. Al-Jacs, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Al-Jacs, Inc. and Albert R. Jacavone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Solis v. VIPswitch, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10826
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
VIPswitch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. Williams et al
as 1:2010cv10813
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Derek Michael Williams and Monitor Staffing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Solis v. Operation Management Group Com, et al
as 10-1380
Petitioner - Appellee:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Respondent - Appellant:
OPERATION MANAGEMENT GROUP COMPANY, INC. and ADILSO BOSI, Individually and as President of Corporate Respondent
Respondent:
DILSON VIERA, Individually and as Accountant of Corporate Respondent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
