Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Pearson Education, Inc. et al v. Dong et al
as 3:2022mc80186
Plaintiff:
Pearson Education, Inc., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Cengage Learning Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zhiming Dong agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of D/B/A MING1015 and Xiaodong Zhang agent of D/B/A LANPIN08 agent of NICK ZHANG
Samuel Love v. Mark G. Stainbrook et al
as 2:2022cv02878
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Defendant:
Mark G. Stainbrook, Huma Ahmed, Karen S. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robert Oliver v. Rose Hills Company et al
as 2:2018cv04818
Defendant:
Does and Rose Hills Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Oliver
Randell v. The Willows Condominium Homeowners Association et al
as 4:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Lori Randell
Defendant:
The Willows Condominium Homeowners Association, Sara Miller, Paul Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DuShane v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
Jasen Lynn DuShane
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Sacramento County Superior Court, - George Hills Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. State of California, et al
as 2:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Joshua Neil Harrell
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lau v. Cirillo et al
as 5:2013cv03946
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Lau
Defendant:
Ceil Cirillo, Economic Development Department, City of Santa Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Frost v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 2:2013cv05371
Defendant:
Does, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Frost
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
