Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Defendant:
Kimberly Sullivan, Core Civic, Cimarron Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Reco D Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Core Civic et al
as 4:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Reco D Manning
Defendant:
Core Civic, Cimarron Correctional Facility, Kimberly Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Gillespie et al
as 5:2018cv00467
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Nikki Gillespie, Greg Jones, Kealey Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harms v. Byrd et al
as 5:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Harms
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd and John Hilligoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Core Civic et al
as 5:2017cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Core Civic, Chad Miller, FNU Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
William Henderson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Chad Miller, Larry Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tabb v. Hilligoss et al
as 5:2016cv01179
Plaintiff:
Dominique Tabb
Defendant:
John Hilligoss, Nicky Gillespie and FNU Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Umoren v. Byrd et al
as 5:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
John Wilson Umoren
Defendant:
Warden Byrd, Braggs, Chief Hilligoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
