Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCarty v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Michael McCarty
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Aaron Smith, Andrew England and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harbin v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Petitioner:
David Lee Harbin
Respondent:
Hon. Ashley Hines and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Christina Hines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hines v. U.S. Dept. Of Justice
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
DeAndreus Hines
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. Of Justice
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Hines
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
April Hines
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hines v. Oakgrove Retirement Home, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Hines
Defendant:
Oakgrove Retirement Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hines v. Columbus, Mississippi et al
as 1:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Jemarco Harris, Thomas Culpepper, Lowndes County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hines v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
Laura Hines
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
