Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hitchcock v. Town of Poestenkill, New York et al
as 1:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hitchcock
Defendant:
Town of Poestenkill, New York, Keith Hammond and Tracy Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stratton v. Rutland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lisa Stratton
Defendant:
Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Rutland City Police Department, Trinity Episcopal Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1742
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1736
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCrudden v. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al
as 1:2013cv06930
Plaintiff:
Vincent Patrick McCrudden
Defendant:
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Gary Gensler, Timothy J. Mulreaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. District Attorney of County of Schenectady et al
as 1:2010cv00618
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Harris
Defendant:
District Attorney of County of Schenectady, Robert Carney, Michelle Schnettino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
