Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Respondent:
Jay M. Hoke, Victor Navy, T. M. Divita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Conrad Victor Hoke, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoke et al v. USDA Rural Development Rural Housing Services et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Pritt, The Estates of, Pritt Law Firm, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Hoke and Donnie Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hoke v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv10032
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hoke
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoke et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28887
Plaintiff:
Patti L. Hoke and Raymond E. Hoke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2014cv13318
Plaintiff:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Defendant:
Jay Hoke, Jackie Stevens, T. M. Davita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoke v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27542
Plaintiff:
Patti Hoke
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Proctor et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Rogers
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daye v. Proctor et al
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Cornell F. Daye
Defendant:
David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoke v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv18743
Plaintiff:
Janet Phillips Hoke
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
