Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HOLMES v. HANLON
as 1:2022cv02058
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
JAMES PATRICK HANLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. City of Lafayette et al
as 4:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LONNIE WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowes-Northern v. Choices Hotel International et al
as 2:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Choices Hotel International, Illinois Department of Children Services, Michael Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Jewel Osco Food Store et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jewel-Osco, Store Manager Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Lutisha Faye Johnson and Audrie Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLMES v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and ELECTORATES
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. OXFORD AMERICAN COLLEGE DICTIONARY
as 1:2019cv02708
Plaintiff:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Defendant:
OXFORD AMERICAN COLLEGE DICTIONARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
HOLMES v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 1:2010cv01603
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY HOLMES, SR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
