Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Gossett v. Gailfus et al
as 3:2023cv05850
Plaintiff:
Mark Jonathan Gossett
Defendant:
Terri J Gailfus, Edward Holm, Margrete Holm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gossett v. Jinhong et al
as 3:2023cv05821
Plaintiff:
Mark Jonathan Gossett
Defendant:
Dominique Louise Eng Jinhong, Edward G Holm, Margrete Holm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stawicki v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki and IGGY
Defendant:
Ken Wade, Tim Weed, Trever Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv05557
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Griffith and Brian Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail and City of Tacoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffo v. Owens et al
as 2:2020cv01781
Plaintiff:
William H Saffo and Esmond Holmes
Defendant:
Turner and Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Ferguson
as 3:2020cv05718
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Chris Lanese and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2019cv05717
Defendant:
Yvette Stubbs, Stone, US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma and others
Plaintiff:
Bert Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2019cv05475
Plaintiff:
Kyntrel Jackson, Blake Suess, Bert Holmes and others
Defendant:
S Lohneis, Stone, US Bankruptcy Court Clerk for the City of Tacoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Lanese
as 3:2019cv05027
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
Christopher Lanese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. Bowden
as 2:2019cv00042
Petitioner:
Joel Christopher Holmes
Respondent:
George N Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
