Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Doll et al v. Home Depot, Inc., The et al
as 1:2014cv02848
Plaintiff:
Neil E Doll and Beulah Doll
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., The , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and HD Development of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Brown v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 1:2014cv00541
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Brown
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Armstrong et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2013cv02840
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Armstrong and James Armstrong
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akron Hardware Consultants, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
as 5:2013cv02755
Plaintiff:
Akron Hardware Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Allen v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
as 1:2013cv02554
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc
Plaintiff:
Vivette Allen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Nyarkoh-Ocran v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01120
Defendant:
The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , Lloyd Jarrell , Timothy Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Nyarkoh-Ocran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gard v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 1:2013cv02051
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gard
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Headley et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01839
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc , Home Depot Store Support LLC , John Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joellen Headley and Ronnie Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. MAT Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01834
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant
Defendant:
MAT Holdings, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc , Home Depot Store 3803 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
