Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Norman et al v. Home Depot (U.S.A.), Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv11403
Defendant:
MTD Products, Inc. and Home Depot (U.S.A.), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Norman and Shirley Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv11379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Roukounakis v. Louisville Ladder Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14163
Plaintiff:
Nektarios Roukounakis
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder Inc., Cuprum S.A. de C.V. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greenfield v. Honda Motor Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2013cv12648
Plaintiff:
Richard Greenfield
Defendant:
Honda Motor Co. Ltd., American Honda Motor CO., Inc., Honda Power Equipment Mfg. Inc. and others
Auto Owners Insurance Company v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Auto Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Shanghai Limach Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kotsch v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2012cv14229
Plaintiff:
Stephanie L. Kotsch
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Merrick et al v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13630
Plaintiff:
Willie Amos Merrick and Wilma C Merrick
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Devilbiss Air Power Company, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv12179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rojem v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv11660
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and MTD Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rojem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myles v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2012cv11659
Plaintiff:
Synobia L. Myles
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
