Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wieder v. The City of New York
as 13-2092
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Howard L. Wieder
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Rosario Berg and Jose Berg
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Police Officer # Jose Ramos and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quiles et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00953
Defendant:
Angelo Conetta, Ken Costa, John DeCicco and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Demico and Sundel Quiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Milewski v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
Andrej Milewski
Defendant:
The City of New York, The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
