Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mendez-Mendez v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.
as 8:2017cv00493
Respondent:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations, U. S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Sergio Elias Mendez-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2015cv00218
CDF:
All the Contract Detention Facilities
IGSA:
All the Intergovernmental Service Agreement Facilities
SPC:
All the Service Processing Centers
Defendant:
All the Warden of the Jail and Detention Centers contracted by I.C.E., Chief Operator of the Detention Operation Manual, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Escobar v. Pottawattamie County Jail et al
as 8:2011cv00112
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Pottawattamie County Jail
Petitioner:
Hector Melendez Escobar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elmardoudi v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 8:2010cv00390
Plaintiff:
Abdel-ilah Elmardoudi
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
