Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rogers v. Hendrick Honda, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00281
Plaintiff:
Frances Rogers
Defendant:
Hendrick Honda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. One 2015 Dodge Promaster Van et al
as 3:2020cv00336
Defendant:
One 2015 Dodge Promaster Van, One 2015 Honda Odyssey Minivan and Approximately $3,708.00 in Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meiser et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Erin K. Meiser , Marjorie Michelle Avery and Sonya A (Tipton) Leonard
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. , Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. One 2008 Honda Accord
as 3:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2008 Honda Accord
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Property Forfeiture
Young et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Defendant:
FMC Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M. Young and Sara Workman
Cross Defendant:
Crane Environmental, Inc., William Powell Company and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
United States of America v. 2005 Honda Accord
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2005 Honda Accord
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. One 2008 Honda Accord
as 3:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Honda Accord, 2008
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.