Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Iseke et al v. Honolulu, City and County of et al
as 1:2015cv00193
Plaintiff:
Marvin Iseke, Alice Ubando and Shirley Ann Lessary
Defendant:
Honolulu, City and County of , John Does 1-50 and U.S. Department of Housing And Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Adkins v. Terakawa
as 1:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Joshua I. Adkins
Defendant:
Dean Terakawa, Dennis Ahn, Honolulu, City and County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Li v City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Qin Li
Defendant:
Honolulu, City and County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Honolulu, City and County of et al
as 1:2014cv00478
Plaintiff:
Choon James
Defendant:
Honolulu, City and County of and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ilae v. Tenn et al
as 1:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
John S. Ilae
Defendant:
Rodney Tenn, Louis M. Kealoha, Honolulu, City and County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Okawaki v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Janis S. Okawaki
Defendant:
Robert Sanchez, Sheri Dolder, Hawaii, State of, Judiciary and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Guerette et al
as 1:2009cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenneth A. Guerette, Jr., Susanna Louisa Jones-Hart, House of Finance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Matubang v. Honolulu, City and County of et al
as 1:2009cv00130
Plaintiff:
Victor Matubang
Defendant:
Honolulu, City and County of, Kevin Takahara, Eagle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Torres v. Honolulu, City and County of
as 1:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
Patrick Torres and Patrick Torres
Defendant:
Honolulu, City and County of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
