Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01674
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Schoene v. Rasmussen et al
as 3:2023cv01151
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Schoene
Defendant: Carrie Rasmussen, Anthony Frasier, Hood River County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35197
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Hood River County School Distr v. Student
as 21-35616
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOOD RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant / Appellee: STUDENT
James Murphy v. Thomas Welhelm, et al
as 21-35367
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS J. WELHELM, M.D. and HOOD RIVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Defendant: CITY OF HOOD RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD
Neal v. State of Oregon Sheriff's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00307
Plaintiff: Bret Wyatt Neal
Defendant: D.A.'s Office of Hood River County, Kate Brown, Carrie Resmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01690
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Murphy v. Welhelm et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01733
Defendant: Hood River City Police Department, Thomas J Welhelm and Hood River County District Attorney Office
Plaintiff: James Michael Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?