Cases 1 - 7 of 7
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Watson Realty Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J. Arko and Andrew M. Moore
Defendant:
Watson Realty Corp., Premiere Plus Realty Co., Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. Arc Realty LLC
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
1925 Hooper LLC, Robert J Arko and Andrew M Moore
Defendant:
Arc Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
1925 Hooper LLC et al v. The National Association of Realtors et al
as 1:2023cv05392
Plaintiff:
Janet Phillips, Joseph Hunt, Edith Anne Hunt and others
Defendant:
The National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., HSF Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hooper et al v. BMW AG et al
as 3:2017cv06416
Plaintiff:
Clay Hooper and Scott Wyatt
Defendant:
BMW AG, BMW of North America, LLC, Volkswagen AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02796
Defendant:
: German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, Audi of America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Briscoe, Marilyn Fong, Travis Burton and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert B. Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Raymond Reudy, et al v. Clearchannel Outdoor, Inc., et al
as 10-15533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND REUDY and MARK KEVIN HICKS, DBA Advertising Display Systems
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., a Delaware corporation, WILLIAM HOOPER, an individual, CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and others
Reudy et al v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. et al
as 3:2006cv05409
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reudy doing business as Advertising Display Systems, Kevin Hicks doing business as Advertising Display Systems and ADS-1
Defendant:
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., William Hooper, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
